Local developments

West Barnes Gasholders - Redevelopment

Some of our members are wondering about the future of the obsolete gasholders, near Motspur Park Station. These are situated in the Kingston constituency, but are scheduled for demolition, in line with Ofgem strategy. Redevelopment of the site would also affect residents in the West Barnes area in terms of access and construction works. Members are been keeping an eye on the proposals and we understand that, although architects’ plans have been drawn up, there has not yet been a recent planning application submitted to Kingston Council. 

However, there was a broad application made in 2017 and Scotia Gas Network (SGN) also notified Merton Planning in 2018 about the need for a protected access route to the site from West Barnes Lane. Further details as soon as we have them.

Merton Building Control

In July 2024, we received the following useful information from Building Control at the London Borough of Merton 

From: Building Control <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>

Our telephone lines are open from 9am-12pm (Midday) on weekdays: 020 8545 3145 or 020 8545 3931. Our surveyors take calls between 2-5pm. For Dangerous Structures call the above numbers, if these are busy or you are calling outside of office hours call: 020 8543 9750. 

Your enquiry can often be resolved with these frequently used resources:

 

Building Control 

Do I need Building Control 

Building Control Application Forms & Fees 

Booking Inspections 

We take bookings via the official LABC App: 

Google Play (Android)

Apple App Store 

 

Planning 

Do I need Planning Permission/Permitted Development Rights 

If you are a flat, maisonette or a Listed Building you do not benefit from permitted development and you will require the formal consent of the Council.   

Should you require a formal determination that you do not require Planning Permission from the Local Planning Authority, you would need to apply for a Lawful Development Certificate. Details of these and how to apply can be found on the Planning Portal link. 

If your proposal doesn’t fall within Permitted Development, you can also apply for Planning Permission from the Planning Portal website. 

Planning Guidance, Pre-Application advice and Planning Enforcement 

Tree Application Forms & Fees 

 

Property Searches and Land Matters 

Planning & Building Control Documentation/Decisions/S106/TPO’s 

Historic documents can be requested by contacting the relevant email address:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Listed Buildings/Locally Listed Buildings

Statutory Listed Buildings

Locally Listed Buildings 

Land Ownership

We do not hold records of land ownership, please contact Land Registry at;

Land Registry Office, Trafalgar House, 1 Bedford Park, Croydon, CR0 2AQ

0844 892 1111. 

Party Wall

We do not deal with Party Wall queries, information can be found on the central government website. 

Boundary Disputes

This is a civil matter, you would need to seek Legal advice. If you do not have your own representative, you can to speak to the Merton Citizens Advice Bureau. 

 

 

AELTC - Grand Drive - March 2024

Residents in the Grand Drive cottages continue to experience excessive inconvenience from extra traffic, parking, noise and intrusive lighting associated with the AELTC development. Mary-Jane Jeanes has been looking at the various plans and agreements and we are liaising with one of our members who lives on this stretch of Grand Drive.

 

More LESSA News - March 2024

Planning Conditions

We have been forwarded to following extract from an email to Cllr John Oliver, which he received from the LBM Planning Department, concerning the “LESSA” Site, Meadowview Road. 

“ ……. pre-commencement conditions remain outstanding, so at this point the development cannot lawfully commence. Critically, pre-commencement conditions requiring the submission of a Working Method Statement, Construction Logistics Plan & Demolition and Construction Environmental Management Plan have not yet been discharged (they have been submitted but changes to the documents are required following review by the Council’s Highway Officer). The list of actions included in the letter includes some substantial works which appear to be more than site preparation, such as road formation and retaining wall formation (and possibly other items on the list also). I have, today, asked the consultant dealing with the condition discharge applications to clarify why this letter has been sent, given that pre-commencement conditions remain outstanding. I have advised that no development pursuant to the implementation of the permission be commenced until the conditions are discharged. I have also asked whether any works have commenced, as today was the date that the letter states works will start. 

If it is identified that there is a breach of planning control, then the planning department can consider how to progress in terms of planning enforcement.”

 

Archaeology

On a separate matter, we are aware that some items of archaeological interest have been found during the preliminary dig on the LESSA site and that the findings have been sent to Bellway. Our Chairman, John Elvidge, is pursuing this matter.

 

Meadowview Road - Complaint to LBM

LATEST NEWS ABOUT MEADOWVIEW ROAD (22/P2351) - RPWBRA'S COMPLAINT TO MERTON

Members and visitors to this website are probably aware that the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities  was considering whether to refer the planning application submitted by Bellway, to build 107 homes on the "LESSA" sports field, to the Planning Inspectorate. This application (22/P2351) was approved by the Merton Planning Committee in September 2022.

We regret to report that the Secretary of State has declined to refer the application to the Planning Inspectorate and, consequently, last year's approval by Merton's Planning Committee now stands.

The RPWBRA had previously indicated that it wished to complain to Merton about the process leading up to Merton's decision. However, Merton wished to defer reviewing our association's complaint until after the Secretary of State's decision. As that time has now come, the RPWBRA has now submitted the complaint, which may be read here.

 

Housing and Planning Guidance

We draw attention to the speech by the Prime Minister on 6th March regarding the “housing crises” and the provision of “affordable “housing. The Government is concerned about both the shortage and cost of housing. It appears that developers are permitted to aim for a “suitable return “(i.e. profit) of 20% but often claim that they cannot achieve this AND at the same time deliver the proportion of social subsidised housing - either for sale or rent - which Councils want. 

The Government is suggesting that the ‘viability assessment ‘(through which developers can submit that they can only achieve a 20% profit on a scheme by reducing the proportion of social housing required by Councils) should be made public except in exceptional circumstances. Also, there is a proposal to urge developers to aim for a profit margin of about 6% when building social housing with the aim that this would guarantee an ‘end-sale ‘at a known value. It appears that the Government is keen to increase housing supply by encouraging developers to build more blocks of flats and convert and build on top of existing shops and offices provided that the final scheme is not higher than buildings in the immediate vicinity. In short, to build upwards. 

The ‘permitted development ‘provisions (which originated in 2013 and currently extend to 2019) may also be amended to permit ‘upwards ‘extensions provided the extension is “consistent with the prevailing height and form of neighbouring properties”. 

The Mayor of London (the Greater London Authority) is currently consulting on revisions to the London Plan (the GLA Planning Guidance document). One of the recommendations is that London Councils should seek an “affordable” housing contribution of at least 35% but for large schemes, e.g. on former industrial sites, they should aim for a 50% contribution. Such a high figure would probably meet with strong opposition by developers who would argue that they could not make a reasonable profit AND provide half the housing for ‘social’ needs. 

David Freeman - May 2018

 

Join us on:

Facebook  

Share this page: